"Yeah......Babe Yeah!!!" Breasts: A woman's ultimate symbol of nurture and nature, two sags of glorious mammalian glands on a woman's body. It is a wondrous "gift" from mother nature, these beautiful molds of human flesh, without which generations of human babies will have no other option but to feed on expensive milk formulas.
Babies aside, a woman's bare breasts is a sign of sexual attraction: A set of bouncy, well-shaped and proportioned breasts are the basis of men's inane sexual desires, and thanks to the mechanics of evolution, most men are well-tuned to full-fledged tits, which is essentially a throw-back to prehistoric times when human babies have pretty much little option other than milk from its mother's bosom.
In short, a woman's breasts, otherwise known colloquially as "tits", are natural, wholesome and very usable and beautiful. Ancient pagan religions revere their goddesses by building statues revealing the full busts of their lovely Goddesses, and if anything else a woman's breasts are almost sacred, divine objects.
But alas, with the advent of Judaism and its accursed religious children, Christianity and Islam, a woman, along with her lovely tits, have become bastardized objects of sin and lust, vehicles of man's moral and spiritual destruction which do not deserved to be revealed in public in whatever shape or form, lest they wreck havoc in a male-dominated, patriarchal world. In Islamic countries, women are demonized to the extent that if a woman is ever to reveal her ankles, she is deemed to be a whore and a slut.
You do think that western countries would be more liberal in certain aspects, especially with regards to breasts; unfortunately, thanks to a religious culture fostered by zealous Taliban-style Christians, tits are, by and large, objects of shame and derision, fostered by religious idiots who obfuscate and blur the line between nudity and criminal activity. In such circumstances, flashing a tit can be almost as legally implicating as brandishing an assault rifle and firing into a crowd: A singer who reveals a nipple in a concert, even in supposedly westernized countries, may be an invitation for a lawsuit.
And that is what happened to Janet Jackson, who, in her uneventful and infamous "wardrobe malfunction" in a Superbowl performance in 2004, had the audacity to flash a tit in front of millions of audiences........... bumper.
More court review for 2004 Janet Jackson flash
The U.S. Supreme Court ordered a lower court on Monday to reconsider a ruling that struck down a $550,000 fine against CBS Corp television stations for airing a glimpse of pop singer Janet Jackson's breast during the 2004 Super Bowl. The order sends the case back to a federal appeals court in Philadelphia for further review in light of the Supreme Court's ruling that upheld a U.S. government policy that subjects broadcasters to fines for airing a single expletive blurted out on a live television show. The appeals court ruled in favor of CBS, saying that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" in issuing the fine for a fleeting image of nudity. Jackson's right breast was exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers for a fraction of a second during the live 2004 Super Bowl football halftime show in what fellow pop singer Justin Timberlake later called a "wardrobe malfunction." Timberlake ripped off part of Jackson's bustier exposing Jackson's breast during the show. Despite the brevity, lawmakers and regulators were outraged and vowed a crackdown on broadcast indecency.
"Women are the only oppressed group in our society that lives in intimate association with their opressors. "
- Evelyn Cunningham
No comments:
Post a Comment