Saturday, 5 April 2008

Interfaith Dialogue Rears Its Ugly Head

King Abdullah Dips Hands into Muddled Waters, Advocates Inter-faith Dialogs

Quite sometime back in 2007, I wrote about the sinister reasons (link here) behind inter-faith dialogs and why, as a religiously-slanted mafia session, religious leaders could, in reality, be using just such a political and public platform to propagate their freedom hating, gay-bashing and atheist-killing activities.

On hindsight, I was kind of shocked at my particular clairvoyance with regards to this religiously-inspired phenomenon, even though I couldn't have foretold or predicted that besides the blundering Tony Blair, even the King of Saudi Arabia has wheeled himself into this increasingly massive, driven propaganda which, on the surface, looks like a harmless tea party between, bishops, imams and the pork-eating infidels.

Saudi Arabia Leader Calls for Interfaith Dialogue

King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia called for a dialogue among monotheistic religions Monday, marking a first for the ultra-conservative Muslim kingdom.

"I ask representatives of all the monotheistic religions to meet with their brothers in faith," Abdullah told delegates to a seminar on "Dialogue Among Civilizations between Japan and the Islamic World," according to the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA).

“If God wills it, we will then meet with our brothers from other religions, including those of the Torah and the Gospel... to come up with ways to safeguard humanity," he added.

Abdullah said the country’s top clerics have given him approval to pursue his idea and that he plans to get the opinion of Muslim leaders from other countries.

According to SPA, the Saudi king also intends to address the United Nations on the subject.

"We have lost sincerity, morals, fidelity and attachment to our religions and to humanity," Abdullah said Monday, deploring "the disintegration of the family and the rise of atheism in the world – a frightening phenomenon that all religions must confront and vanquish."

Vanquishing Secular Humanism In Favor of Theocracy and Human Rights Abuse?

As a sectarian religion, Islam is perversely myopic in a way that all Judaism-inspired faiths share: These religions harbor the same, unabashed animosity against all forms of religions, plus ideas that do not fit into their respective religious world views.

In the case of Saudi Arabia, in which our indefatigable Saudi King, Abdullah, rules as a hereditary king, I honestly can't even begin to fathom how humanity even exists in his misogynistic kingdom, unless, of course, his version of "humanity" doesn't quite fit into our evil, secular, and yes, demon-inspired "humanity" of secular folks.

Consider this:

1. The Basic Law of Government (Adopted in 1992) in the oil-rich monarchy mandates that only the first king, Abd Al Aziz Al Saud, and his sons and grandsons to be legitimate rulers of the kingdom.

2. The Quran is the Constitution of Saudi Arabia (Hence, the stoning of women and so on.)

3. According to The Economist's Democracy Index (2007), the opulent Saudi government is the 9th most authoritarian regime in the world. Not bad, considering that the evil, Godless commies in China lie a full 21 places behind. Makes you wonder why the Bush Administration is cuddling up to the rich oil barons, eh? If anything else, it certainly isn't because of the House of Saud's impeccable human rights record!

4. Women are banned from appearing in almost all forms of public life: Women are banned from driving, and a severe, misogynistic apartheid against women meant that widespread discrimination against women that the average Bedouin woman can hardly expect herself to find a decent job in a male-dominated workforce, not to mention the fact that women should only be seen in drab, ugly, Martian-styled fashion known as burkhas, as mandated by the sick and depraved House of Saud.

5. According to Amnesty International, other archaic, ancient tortures, such as flogging, are employed on a variety of "criminals", ranging from dissenters to "inappropriate behavior", in accordance to the strict (and strange) tenets of Islam.

But Mr Abdullah doesn't speak from statistics: He doesn't want to dabble in the specifics! He simply equates his obnoxiously theocratic, abusive regime as the standard barometer for humanity!

& finally, of course, he reviews his true intentions: Atheism, in the little warped mind of this despotic monarch, is a "frightening phenomenon that all must confront and vanquish". That kind of explains why every time a secular newspaper, say in Denmark, begins to publish photos of Muhammad with his bomb-laden turbans, these car-burning, riotous folks of Islam tend to start going amok and incinerate the latest Danish pastry they can lay their filthy hands upon. In their religious ecstasy to get rid of all that is hedonistic, King Abdullah has given us a sneak preview of the insecurities and the siege mentality employed by religious leaders and rioters alike: Any encroachment of their archaic, stone age belief system is a direct threat to their sensibilities, lifestyle and finally, their Deity in question.

Interfaith Dialogs: A Great Pretense to Spread Bigotry On a Grandiose Scale

It is difficult for secular folks like myself not to feel skeptical when reading bigoted propaganda and other religious nonsense: It seems, at this point of time, that certain sections of the Islamic community feel disenchanted enough to petition for patch-up alliance, clobbered together in the hope that secular humanism and other more rational-thinking philosophies can be quashed under the sheer weight of religious tyranny.

The sheer hypocrisy of such gatherings aside, we might just be witnessing a backlash against the rising secularism in a global setting, and the burkha-obsessed Saudi King is practically feeling the heat (with or without the burkha) of those evil, pork munching infidels.


-"It is the inevitable effect of religion on public policy that makes it a matter of public concern. Advocates of religiosity extol the virtues or moral habits that religion is supposed to instill in us. But we should be equally concerned with the intellectual habits it discourages."

Wendy Kaminer

9 comments:

Larro said...

Got your IM.

Great post. I'm reminded of some tame religious laws and statutes here in the States.

People don't realize the teetering line they walk between secularism and theocracy.

I'll have to follow up with a post addressing some goings on in Springfield, Illinois.

Infidel753 said...

According to The Economist's Democracy Index (2007), the opulent Saudi government is the 9th most authoritarian regime in the world.

Good grief, how on Earth did they manage to find eight countries they could claim were more authoritarian than Saudi Arabia?!

It's been said that a religious war is a fight over who has the best imaginary friend. I guess with an "interfaith dialog" it's a discussion of how to overcome those nasty people who somehow get along without an imaginary friend. Hard to say which is scarier.

Anthony said...

I agree that interfaith dialogue is ridiculous...kind of. The most disgusting thing, as an atheist, is the religious view of the atheist. You should have two heads and breathe fire. I started the Atheist Alliance at Sam Houston State University. We recently had a debate with the largest christian org. at the university. The results were very positive. People are nuch more willing to accept us. Now you speak of the world of Islam. Well...we're screwed. Christians and Muslims will never come to any agreement, and the results will be the same for us. While the Christian group at SHSU may seem to accept us, they still think we are hellbound. Good post.

ATHEISTS UNITE!!!

BEAST said...

Thanks, folks.

Tor Hershman said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tor Hershman said...

Knee! Ha!
I t'were just split open like a cat-fish AND at a Catholic Hospital and didn't get hasseled one bit.....well, not till after the fourth day.

Larro said...

"vanquish atheism"?

My ass! How do people think to accomplish this? Ideological argument? Intellectual persuasion? Sorry, they have a handicap called "proving a negative".

I guess we'll all just have to be rounded up and "re-educated".

Anonymous said...

好秘书 中国呼吸网 肿瘤网 中国皮肤网 癌症康复网 工作总结 个人工作总结 班主任工作总结 年终工作总结 工作报告 政府报告 述职报告 述廉报告 考察报告 自查报告 情况报告 调研报告 调查报告 申请报告 辞职报告 实习报告 评估报告 工作汇报 思想汇报 汇报材料 情况通报 情况汇报 心得体会 学习心得 工作心得 培训心得 读后感 演讲稿 竞聘演讲 就职演讲 比赛演讲 征文演讲 节日演讲 演讲技巧 工作意见 活动策划 工作方案 整改方案 实施方案 企划文案 销售方案 培训方案 应急预案 规章制度 法律法规 事迹材料 先进事迹 个人事迹 申报材料 学习材料 考察材料 经验材料 交流材料 自我鉴定 模板范例 技巧经验 工作计划 民主生活会 入党志愿书 入党申请书 入团申请书 转正申请书 通知 毕业论文 合同 肺癌 肝癌 胃癌 肾癌 食道癌 直肠癌 结肠癌 胰腺癌 卵巢癌 宫颈癌 乳腺癌 子宫癌

Kat said...

Great post- thank you for laying things out in such an easy way to understand. SOmetimes it's hard to see past the media representations. You are a good writer, I've enjoyed perusing your blog today.